About What We Know

What We Know is for readers who do not want a developing story filtered through only one outlet. It gathers reporting around the same event, keeps the original sources close, and turns that material into a concise briefing that helps you see the bigger picture before making up your own mind.

We create original, source-linked reporting summaries to help readers compare how outlets describe the same story. We link to the original reporting, minimise quotation, and correct or remove material when warranted.

What a briefing is for

Every story starts with a core account of what the reviewed reporting appears to establish. The source comparison then shows whether a source corroborates that account, adds useful context, or conflicts with it. The goal is not to prescribe a viewpoint; it is to make the reporting around a story easier to inspect.

What we do not claim

A source comparison is not a truth score, a political label, or a count of who is right. Several outlets can repeat the same incomplete account, and a single well-sourced report can add an important qualification. We show what the included sources contribute and make room for what remains unclear.

How AI is used

AI helps organise discovery, clean source material, and draft the briefing and comparison. It does not replace the original reporting. Each published story links back to the publishers used so readers can check the underlying work themselves.

Respecting source material

We aim to use source material only as needed to identify, compare, and link to reporting. We do not intend to replace publisher articles, reproduce full articles, bypass paywalls, or imply that a publisher endorses What We Know.

Creator and Operator

What We Know was created and is operated by Theo Koorehpaz.

Contact

For general enquiries, privacy requests, corrections, and copyright concerns, contact [email protected]